<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whats Better For Designing A Website, Photoshop Or Fireworks?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designreviver.com/general/whats-better-for-designing-a-website-photoshop-or-fireworks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designreviver.com/general/whats-better-for-designing-a-website-photoshop-or-fireworks/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 13:48:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcubic</title>
		<link>http://designreviver.com/general/whats-better-for-designing-a-website-photoshop-or-fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-18422</link>
		<dc:creator>jcubic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreviver.com/?p=5662#comment-18422</guid>
		<description>I use Inkscape, it&#039;s free and open source and it run on GNU/Linux without windows emulator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">I use Inkscape, it&#8217;s free and open source and it run on GNU/Linux without windows emulator.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samejima</title>
		<link>http://designreviver.com/general/whats-better-for-designing-a-website-photoshop-or-fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-13495</link>
		<dc:creator>Samejima</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreviver.com/?p=5662#comment-13495</guid>
		<description>I use firworks for Web graphics and design while photoshop for print graphics since it has CMYK mode aside from RGB mode. Just recently learned photoshop and the interface isn&#039;t really that hard or confusing (as I thought before) now since I&#039;m already familiar with fireworks which has a bit similarity with ps. all in all, both are great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">I use firworks for Web graphics and design while photoshop for print graphics since it has CMYK mode aside from RGB mode. Just recently learned photoshop and the interface isn&#8217;t really that hard or confusing (as I thought before) now since I&#8217;m already familiar with fireworks which has a bit similarity with ps. all in all, both are great.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Misael</title>
		<link>http://designreviver.com/general/whats-better-for-designing-a-website-photoshop-or-fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-13295</link>
		<dc:creator>Misael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreviver.com/?p=5662#comment-13295</guid>
		<description>I prefer Fireworks, but probably just because my photoshop skills aren&#039;t what they should be</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">I prefer Fireworks, but probably just because my photoshop skills aren&#8217;t what they should be</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://designreviver.com/general/whats-better-for-designing-a-website-photoshop-or-fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-13289</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreviver.com/?p=5662#comment-13289</guid>
		<description>I use Photoshop only because it&#039;s what I&#039;ve always used and Fireworks is based off of Macromedia&#039;s original interface. Certain things are now a pain in the butt in PS though ever since they got rid of ImageReady. I personally wish they would have kept ImageReady.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">I use Photoshop only because it&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve always used and Fireworks is based off of Macromedia&#8217;s original interface. Certain things are now a pain in the butt in PS though ever since they got rid of ImageReady. I personally wish they would have kept ImageReady.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Phillips Jr</title>
		<link>http://designreviver.com/general/whats-better-for-designing-a-website-photoshop-or-fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-13234</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Phillips Jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 03:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreviver.com/?p=5662#comment-13234</guid>
		<description>Fantastic site! I&#039;m so happy I &quot;chanced&quot; upon it. I&#039;ll spread the word!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">Fantastic site! I&#8217;m so happy I &#8220;chanced&#8221; upon it. I&#8217;ll spread the word!</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mimi Flynn</title>
		<link>http://designreviver.com/general/whats-better-for-designing-a-website-photoshop-or-fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-13229</link>
		<dc:creator>Mimi Flynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreviver.com/?p=5662#comment-13229</guid>
		<description>I used both for different things. Photoshop is great for, well, photos and other raster images, but fireworks is really great with vector images pulled in from illustrator. When I&#039;m cutting images while coding, I prefer to use Fireworks because I can select and copy by just pointing and clicking on the images instead of digging through the layers.  Fireworks has a great batch processing option too.

Overall, though, I believe its personal preference. When designing, its really best to use the tool you&#039;re most comfortable with... but, when coding, I would suggest exporting from Fireworks.  Its just easy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">I used both for different things. Photoshop is great for, well, photos and other raster images, but fireworks is really great with vector images pulled in from illustrator. When I&#8217;m cutting images while coding, I prefer to use Fireworks because I can select and copy by just pointing and clicking on the images instead of digging through the layers.  Fireworks has a great batch processing option too.</p>
<p>Overall, though, I believe its personal preference. When designing, its really best to use the tool you&#8217;re most comfortable with&#8230; but, when coding, I would suggest exporting from Fireworks.  Its just easy&#8230;</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren McPherson</title>
		<link>http://designreviver.com/general/whats-better-for-designing-a-website-photoshop-or-fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-13223</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren McPherson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreviver.com/?p=5662#comment-13223</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s personal preference. For web ui&#039;s both do the same thing. 

Fireworks was rebuilt for web design and Photoshop is a more powerful all purpose app. kind of like using a nuke to kill a fly.

but like i say, its preference... best designer i know uses Fireworks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">It&#8217;s personal preference. For web ui&#8217;s both do the same thing. </p>
<p>Fireworks was rebuilt for web design and Photoshop is a more powerful all purpose app. kind of like using a nuke to kill a fly.</p>
<p>but like i say, its preference&#8230; best designer i know uses Fireworks.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whats Better For Designing A Website, Photoshop Or Fireworks? &#124; Lively Design Tuts</title>
		<link>http://designreviver.com/general/whats-better-for-designing-a-website-photoshop-or-fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-13221</link>
		<dc:creator>Whats Better For Designing A Website, Photoshop Or Fireworks? &#124; Lively Design Tuts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 16:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreviver.com/?p=5662#comment-13221</guid>
		<description>[...] Direct Link [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">[...] Direct Link [...]</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://designreviver.com/general/whats-better-for-designing-a-website-photoshop-or-fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-13213</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreviver.com/?p=5662#comment-13213</guid>
		<description>Always found both to be very very similar, so much so, that i have never understood why Adobe haven&#039;t just merged the 2 together.

Personal choice for me would be Photoshop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">Always found both to be very very similar, so much so, that i have never understood why Adobe haven&#8217;t just merged the 2 together.</p>
<p>Personal choice for me would be Photoshop.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Thompson</title>
		<link>http://designreviver.com/general/whats-better-for-designing-a-website-photoshop-or-fireworks/comment-page-1/#comment-13211</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreviver.com/?p=5662#comment-13211</guid>
		<description>I personally use fireworks for 99% of my projects, however i&#039;m starting to use pixelmator more as well, which is a much better (and cheaper) alternative to PS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">I personally use fireworks for 99% of my projects, however i&#8217;m starting to use pixelmator more as well, which is a much better (and cheaper) alternative to PS.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

