<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eco-Friendly Packaging Concepts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designreviver.com/articles/eco-friendly-packaging-concepts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designreviver.com/articles/eco-friendly-packaging-concepts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 13:48:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: iphone 5 case</title>
		<link>http://designreviver.com/articles/eco-friendly-packaging-concepts/comment-page-1/#comment-22171</link>
		<dc:creator>iphone 5 case</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 22:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreviver.com/?p=1582#comment-22171</guid>
		<description>Hi there,  You&#039;ve done a great job. I’ll certainly digg it and personally suggest to my friends. I am sure they&#039;ll be benefited from this website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">Hi there,  You&#8217;ve done a great job. I’ll certainly digg it and personally suggest to my friends. I am sure they&#8217;ll be benefited from this website.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheap Balenciaga bags</title>
		<link>http://designreviver.com/articles/eco-friendly-packaging-concepts/comment-page-1/#comment-21856</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheap Balenciaga bags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreviver.com/?p=1582#comment-21856</guid>
		<description>Case what I wanted. Some assume that I&#039;d acquire a lot out of reading through your own write down! You&#039;ve got your going back customer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">Case what I wanted. Some assume that I&#8217;d acquire a lot out of reading through your own write down! You&#8217;ve got your going back customer</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Packaging - tracingraphics</title>
		<link>http://designreviver.com/articles/eco-friendly-packaging-concepts/comment-page-1/#comment-20035</link>
		<dc:creator>Packaging - tracingraphics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 07:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreviver.com/?p=1582#comment-20035</guid>
		<description>[...] i think it is useful to look into Eco friendly packaging as research. I found a website called Design Reviewer, on this website it had a very good artiucle on Eco friendly packaging concepts. I have picked a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">[...] i think it is useful to look into Eco friendly packaging as research. I found a website called Design Reviewer, on this website it had a very good artiucle on Eco friendly packaging concepts. I have picked a [...]</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: online casinos test</title>
		<link>http://designreviver.com/articles/eco-friendly-packaging-concepts/comment-page-1/#comment-19336</link>
		<dc:creator>online casinos test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 18:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreviver.com/?p=1582#comment-19336</guid>
		<description>I like this web very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">I like this web very much.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunil</title>
		<link>http://designreviver.com/articles/eco-friendly-packaging-concepts/comment-page-1/#comment-17638</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreviver.com/?p=1582#comment-17638</guid>
		<description>Looking at these samples, I&#039;m a bit disappointed to see that many of them only look green, while actually being perhaps as wasteful as their predecessors.

Sure, they use unbleached recycled kraft paper, but many of them are also using complex shapes (the GE lightbulbs in particular) which create waste paper, and glue (which can often make a package unrecyclable). 

It seems that being &quot;green&quot; is more of a marketing concern for many (but certainly not all)of the featured products rather than a design ethic, more &quot;Eco-look&quot; than &quot;Eco-friendly&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">Looking at these samples, I&#8217;m a bit disappointed to see that many of them only look green, while actually being perhaps as wasteful as their predecessors.</p>
<p>Sure, they use unbleached recycled kraft paper, but many of them are also using complex shapes (the GE lightbulbs in particular) which create waste paper, and glue (which can often make a package unrecyclable). </p>
<p>It seems that being &#8220;green&#8221; is more of a marketing concern for many (but certainly not all)of the featured products rather than a design ethic, more &#8220;Eco-look&#8221; than &#8220;Eco-friendly&#8221;.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All this packaging &#124; &#39;Almost all creativity involves purposeful play&#39;</title>
		<link>http://designreviver.com/articles/eco-friendly-packaging-concepts/comment-page-1/#comment-16522</link>
		<dc:creator>All this packaging &#124; &#39;Almost all creativity involves purposeful play&#39;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 11:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreviver.com/?p=1582#comment-16522</guid>
		<description>[...] ECO-friendly packacking is possible&#8230;&#8230;..have a look at Design Reviver &amp; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">[...] ECO-friendly packacking is possible&#8230;&#8230;..have a look at Design Reviver &amp; [...]</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mohsin</title>
		<link>http://designreviver.com/articles/eco-friendly-packaging-concepts/comment-page-1/#comment-15571</link>
		<dc:creator>mohsin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreviver.com/?p=1582#comment-15571</guid>
		<description>great go on</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">great go on</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chameera</title>
		<link>http://designreviver.com/articles/eco-friendly-packaging-concepts/comment-page-1/#comment-15258</link>
		<dc:creator>Chameera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 01:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreviver.com/?p=1582#comment-15258</guid>
		<description>Do you guys know that, To manufacturer 3.5 tons of paper, we need to have 5 tons of Natural trees. So, Better look for a way to recycle polythene and plastics. Do not go for paper and let the companies cut trees as much as they need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">Do you guys know that, To manufacturer 3.5 tons of paper, we need to have 5 tons of Natural trees. So, Better look for a way to recycle polythene and plastics. Do not go for paper and let the companies cut trees as much as they need.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederik Hastrup</title>
		<link>http://designreviver.com/articles/eco-friendly-packaging-concepts/comment-page-1/#comment-15211</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederik Hastrup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 16:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreviver.com/?p=1582#comment-15211</guid>
		<description>Kunun Maparayum Aug 1, 2009, wrote:

&quot;It’s sad that, for a lot of brands “eco friendly” it’s more a communication value (or a fad) than a thing worthy by itself: a way to sell more stuff rather than to make the planet a tad greener. But, on the other hand, maybe with small initiatives like this, the fad gains momentum and becomes a remarkable force of change. Let’s hope!&quot;

I agree with Kanun, however, we (the U.S.) are at least 2 decades behind the rest of the civilized world when it comes to initiatives designed to help ourselves help our planet. Kanun refers to &quot;small initiatives&quot;. That is fine, as long we are content with not keeping up and, in effect reversing progress. We have always accepted &quot;small&quot; initiatives. This doesn&#039;t work. We are at the 11th hour, and achieving critical mass (of stupidity and ignorance). What we, as a nation, have not been able to do (recently), is take a hard stand on anything which will positively affect us. Forget about the 7 generation rule, we cannot come to terms with helping ourselves. Without getting into politics......but if the President or Congress provided a mandate based on intellect and fact, (I realize this may be an oxymoron), and demanded everyone, especially large coporations, follow a recommended guideline for sustainable change, we should follow it. We have too many choices, too many laws which allow too many loopholes. Upon a recent business trip to Scandinavia, I conversed with many people in industry and in the general public. Scandinavia originated the concept of eco-friendly (everything) many years ago. I tried to discuss the concept of renewable resources, personal accountability regarding sustainable practices, etc. Guess what? They had no idea what I was talking about. Why? Because they have been respectfully requested to act responsibly by their leaders to practice a sustainable lifestyle. It has been ingrained into their lives. They no longer have to think about it. The reason they practice this lifestyle is that their leaders have recognized this need over 20 years ago, and acted upon doing what was right - for themselves, for children 7 generations from now, for their country, and for the planet. Very enlightening visit. We need to get off this facade of sustainability and actually come together and DO something about it, for the right reasons, not treat this as a fad, and really force companies to DO something real, without providing lip service through their &quot;green washed&quot; advertisement. &#039;Nuf said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">Kunun Maparayum Aug 1, 2009, wrote:</p>
<p>&#8220;It’s sad that, for a lot of brands “eco friendly” it’s more a communication value (or a fad) than a thing worthy by itself: a way to sell more stuff rather than to make the planet a tad greener. But, on the other hand, maybe with small initiatives like this, the fad gains momentum and becomes a remarkable force of change. Let’s hope!&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree with Kanun, however, we (the U.S.) are at least 2 decades behind the rest of the civilized world when it comes to initiatives designed to help ourselves help our planet. Kanun refers to &#8220;small initiatives&#8221;. That is fine, as long we are content with not keeping up and, in effect reversing progress. We have always accepted &#8220;small&#8221; initiatives. This doesn&#8217;t work. We are at the 11th hour, and achieving critical mass (of stupidity and ignorance). What we, as a nation, have not been able to do (recently), is take a hard stand on anything which will positively affect us. Forget about the 7 generation rule, we cannot come to terms with helping ourselves. Without getting into politics&#8230;&#8230;but if the President or Congress provided a mandate based on intellect and fact, (I realize this may be an oxymoron), and demanded everyone, especially large coporations, follow a recommended guideline for sustainable change, we should follow it. We have too many choices, too many laws which allow too many loopholes. Upon a recent business trip to Scandinavia, I conversed with many people in industry and in the general public. Scandinavia originated the concept of eco-friendly (everything) many years ago. I tried to discuss the concept of renewable resources, personal accountability regarding sustainable practices, etc. Guess what? They had no idea what I was talking about. Why? Because they have been respectfully requested to act responsibly by their leaders to practice a sustainable lifestyle. It has been ingrained into their lives. They no longer have to think about it. The reason they practice this lifestyle is that their leaders have recognized this need over 20 years ago, and acted upon doing what was right &#8211; for themselves, for children 7 generations from now, for their country, and for the planet. Very enlightening visit. We need to get off this facade of sustainability and actually come together and DO something about it, for the right reasons, not treat this as a fad, and really force companies to DO something real, without providing lip service through their &#8220;green washed&#8221; advertisement. &#8216;Nuf said.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Good.is (Journal 10) &#171; [LAUREN SCHIMMING]</title>
		<link>http://designreviver.com/articles/eco-friendly-packaging-concepts/comment-page-1/#comment-14063</link>
		<dc:creator>Good.is (Journal 10) &#171; [LAUREN SCHIMMING]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 02:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designreviver.com/?p=1582#comment-14063</guid>
		<description>[...] Good also likes eco friendly packaging.. another successfully developing area of design. This article reminds me of the concepts that we are working on in Graphic Design 1.  Here are some more examples. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody">[...] Good also likes eco friendly packaging.. another successfully developing area of design. This article reminds me of the concepts that we are working on in Graphic Design 1.  Here are some more examples. [...]</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

